How are Sustainability Disclosures by Smart Cities, Symbolic or Substantive?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17977/%20um004v13i12026p042Keywords:
Smart City, Sustainability Disclosure, LegitimacyAbstract
Purpose: This study aims to understand the themes of sustainability disclosure by smart cities in Indonesia through the lens of legitimacy theory.
Method: We analyzed 199 sustainability disclosure narratives and visuals from 24 smart cities in Indonesia using content analysis. Meanwhile, legitimacy theory was used as an analytical tool to identify substantive and symbolic disclosures.
Findings: Sustainability disclosures by smart cities are dominated by reports on environmental programs and commitments. Meanwhile, sustainability disclosures are mostly substantive (69%) rather than symbolic (31%).
Originality/Value: This study provides new insights into sustainability disclosure in the context of smart cities in Indonesia, using textual and visual sources and the lens of legitimacy theory.
References
Adams, C. A., & Abhayawansa, S. (2022). Connecting the COVID-19 Pandemic, Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Investing and Calls for ‘Harmonisation’ of Sustainability Reporting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 82, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2021.102309.
Aleksandrov, E., Dybtsyna, E., Grossi, G., & Bourmistrov, A. (2022). Rankings for Smart City Dialogue? Opening Up a Critical Scrutiny. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 34(5), 622–643. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-03-2021-0059.
Angelidou, M. (2014). Smart City Policies: A Spatial Approach. Cities, 41, 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.06.007.
Bebbington, J., & Gray, R. (2001). An Account of Sustainability: Failure, Success and a Reconceptualization. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12(5), 557–588. https://doi.org/10.1006/cpac.2000.0450.
Bebbington, J., & Unerman, J. (2018). Achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: An Enabling Role for Accounting Research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-05-2017-2929.
Boiral, O. (2013). Sustainability Reports as Simulacra? A Counter-Account of A and A+ GRI Reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(7), 1036–1071. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2012-00998.
Brunelli, S., Falivena, C., Carlino, C., & Venuti, F. (2020). Accountability for Climate Change: A Research Synthesis through the Lenses of the Integrated Thinking Approach. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(4), 1005–1038. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-01-2020-0682.
Chelli, M., Durocher, S., & Fortin, A. (2019). Substantive and Symbolic Strategies Sustaining the Environmentally Friendly Ideology: A Media-Sensitive Analysis of the Discourse of a Leading French Utility. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32(4), 1013–1042. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-02-2018-3343.
Cho, C. H., Laine, M., Roberts, R. W., & Rodrigue, M. (2015). Organized Hypocrisy, Organizational Façades, and Sustainability Reporting. Counting, Organizations and Society, 40, 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.12.003.
Cho, S. J. (2019). Study on the Relationship between CSR and Financial Performance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(2), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020343.
Cho, S. Y. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility Performance and Information Asymmetry. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32(1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2012.10.005.
Cohen, S., & Karatzimas, S. (2022). Analyzing Smart Cities’ Reporting: Do They Report “Smart”?. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Financial Management, 34(5), 602–621. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-12-2020-0198.
Deegan, C. (2002). The Legitimising Effect of Social and Environmental Disclosures – A Theoretical Foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570210435852.
Hasibuan, A., & Sulaiman, O. K. (2019). Smart City, Konsep Kota Cerdas sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Masalah Perkotaan Kabupaten/Kota, di Kota-Kota Besar Provinsi Sumatera Utara. Buletin Utama Teknik, 14(2), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.33884/BUT.V14I2.1097.
Herdiyanti, A., Hapsari, P. S., & Susanto, T. D. (2019). Modelling the Smart Governance Performance to Support Smart City Program in Indonesia. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.135.
Hu, R., Xu, W., & Yang, Y. (2023). The Evolution of Electric Technology in the Context of China’s Low-Carbon Transformation: A Patent Analysis. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 15(2), 176–194. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-04-2022-0050.
Kaur, A., & Lodhia, S. (2018). Stakeholder Engagement in Sustainability Accounting and Reporting: A Study of Australian Local Councils. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31(1), 338–368. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2014-1901.
Kementerian Komunikasi dan Digital. (2022). Langkah Menuju “100 Smart City”. Kemenkominfo. https://www.komdigi.go.id/berita/sorotan-media/detail/langkah-menuju-100-smart-city.
Kementerian PUPR. (2023). Masterplan Smart City Indonesia.
Kress, G., & Leeuwen, T. V. (2020). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. New York: Routledge.
Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Thousand Oaks, California, AS: SAGE Publications.
Mahayani, N. M. H. (2024). Evaluasi Implementasi Smart City di Indonesia: Tantangan Teknologi dan Keberlanjutan. Governance: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Politik Lokal dan Pembangunan, 10(4), 106-117. https://doi.org/10.56015/gjikplp.v10i4.209.
Mahesa, R., Yudoko, G., & Anggoro, Y. (2019). Dataset on the Sustainable Smart City Development in Indonesia. Data in Brief, 25, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104098.
Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). CSR Reporting Practices and the Quality of Disclosure: An Empirical Analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.10.003.
Myers, M. D. (2013). Qualitative Research in Business and Management. Thousand Oaks, California, AS: SAGE Publications.
OECD. (2020). Consumption Tax Trends 2020. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/consumption-tax-trends-2020_152def2d-en.html.
Ogilvy, S., O’Brien, D., Lawrence, R., & Gardner, M. (2022). A Natural Capital Accounting Framework to Communicate the Environmental Credentials of Individual Wool-Producing Businesses. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(4), 765–802. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-06-2021-0191.
Pachauri, R. K., Allen, M. R., Barros, V. R., Broome, J., Cramer, W., Christ, R., Church, J. A., Clarke, L., Dahe, Q., Dasgupta, P., Dubash, N. K., Edenhofer, O., Elgizouli, I., Field, C. B., Forster, P., Friedlingstein, P., Fuglestvedt, J., Gomez-Echeverri, L., Hallegatte, S., ... van Ypserle, J. P. (2014): Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Wahyu Mustika Rani, Sri Pujiningsih, Satia Nur Maharani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
